Wednesday 14 March 2012

Our Crime: Attacked
BBC Three - 23rd April 2012


'Our Crime' is a series that has been broadcast on BBC Three, showing the consequences of youth crime today.


The episode 'Attacked' focused on stories of two different attacks that took place in south London. Both attacks lead to the death of the victims, of which were very different people.


One of the attacks was committed by a group of male youths aged between 14-16 years, who went around their town filming themselves assaulting innocent members of the public as a game of 'Happy Slapping'. They would then post these videos on line for others to see. However, one 'happy slapping' that went wrong ended with an innocent man being killed in public while standing outside his mosque with his granddaughter.


At the beginning of the documentary, a number of establishing shots are used to introduce the viewers to Tooting, south London which is where this crime took place.
As the story about the crime started to develop, CCTV footage of the incident and various other CCTV footage that the police used to identify the gang were shown. Clips that the gang had posted on line of other happy slappings were also shown in the documentary. By showing the audience this horrific footage, it strongly puts the point of the documentary across that crime in Britain needs to be stopped. It also helps the audience visually understand the extent to how serious and unprovoked the attacks were.
CCTV footage of attack on 'Our Crime: Attacked'

There were interviews with people who were associated with the attackers or the victim. One interview was with one of the attackers neighbours. She gave a background view as to what the attackers were like, to help the audience build a picture and opinion on them. There were also interviews with the victims step daughter and one of his friends who was there at the time of the attack. They helped to build a picture of what the victim was like and the consequences the attack has had on their lives. A metropolitan police officer was also interviewed, informing the audience of how crimes like this are dealt with.


The second story was about a gang rivalry attack on a young boy aged just 15. He was chased off the premiss of his school by a rival gang and then stabbed to death in a nearby garden. When broadcast on the news as an 'attack between 2 rival gangs', his family believed it portrayed him in the wrong light and as  much of a criminal as his attackers. However, in an interview with his sisters and brother, and teachers from his school, it was revealed that he was just a bubbly but naive teenage boy who was reeled in to becoming part of a gang, much like a number of young people in Britain today. The gang responsible for the death of the young boy had posted videos of them selves on YouTube, rapping and bragging about how they carry weapons and aren't afraid to use them to protect their territory. These videos were shown in the documentary so that the audience could paint a picture of what the gang were like.
Zak - The victim of the attack


Photos of the victim and archive footage are shown a number of times throughout the documentary to reveal his outgoing nature and help us sympathise and connect with him even though he has passed away.
CCTV footage of him being chased along a road moments before the attack and footage of the crime scene cornered off are shown to shock the audience and make them feel like they are present even though they're not.
At the end of this story, a montage of footage of the victim is shown to make the audience see that he was just an innocent young boy that shouldn't have been killed and to once again get the point of the documentary across that crime in Britain needs to be stopped.


For both the stories, when interviews are being shown, the interviewees are watching the same clip that the audience had just watched. This is effective because it shows their reactions to the same footage and helps you understand what they are experiencing when being connected to such a horrific crime.
The interviewees were used as voice overs and there was little interaction with the film maker apart from occasionally heard asking questions.
Tense music is played throughout most of the documentary to make the audience feel on edge, up until the actions of the crime have been mentioned or shown. The sound then goes silent apart from the interviewee talking which creates the sense of shock. The music then changes to more low toned and slow which creates a sad atmosphere.
For both stories it shows archive footage of news channels that have spoken about these attacks. This creates a sense of reality and demonstrates how serious crimes like this are.


Throughout the documentary, the view of how tragic Britain is becoming when it comes to youth crime is put across. The idea that both of these attacks were fuelled by social networking and internet rivalry, something that every one of us can relate to, makes the audience realise that its not just a TV programme and that it is a real life story that could happen to any one of us.

No comments:

Post a Comment